Author: stuart taylor
Date: 03:10:17 01/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2003 at 03:02:33, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>On January 31, 2003 at 02:24:49, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>
>>I don't understand this post either. It looks like a repost, or, I don't know
>>which words to read.
>>S.Taylor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On January 31, 2003 at 01:04:36, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>On January 31, 2003 at 00:59:43, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>Two minutes before Kasparov made the blundering move I posted what seems to be
>>>>ridiculous, but if you check it with any program EUREKA, Kasparov missed it!
>>>>
>>>>>>[Event "Man vs Machine"]
>>>>>>[Site "NY"]
>>>>>>[Date "2003.01.30"]
>>>>>>[Round "3"]
>>>>>>[White "Kasparov"]
>>>>>>[Black "Deep Junior"]
>>>>>>[Result "0-1"]
>>>>>>[ECO "D45"]
>>>>>>[Annotator "Eduard Nemeth"]
>>>>>>[PlyCount "72"]
>>>>>>[EventDate "2003.??.??"]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e3 e6 5. Nf3 Nbd7 6. Qc2 b6 7. cxd5 exd5 8. Bd3
>>>>>>8... Be7 {Diesen Zug erwartete Kasparov offenbar nicht, denn er ueberlegte
>>>>>>hier nun 17 Min. Hier scheint Kasparov} 9. Bd2 9... O-O $146 {Ld2 hat auch
>>>>>>Deep Junior aus dem Buch gebracht. Nach einigem Rechnen rochierte er.} (9...
>>>>>>Bb7 10. O-O (10. O-O-O c5 11. Kb1 Qc7 12. Rhg1 c4 13. Bf5 g6 14. Bh3 a6 15. g3
>>>>>>b5 16. e4 Nxe4 17. Nxe4 dxe4 18. Ng5 Nf6 19. Bg2 O-O 20. Nxe4 Nxe4 21. Bxe4
>>>>>>Bxe4 22. Qxe4 Bf6 23. Bf4 Qb6 24. Be5 24... Bxe5 {
>>>>>>A-A Bergez,L-Nezar,M/FRA-ch qual 1999/EXT 2000}) 10... O-O 11. Ng5 h6 12. Nh3
>>>>>>c5 13. f4 Rc8 14. Nf2 Re8 15. Rae1 Bd6 16. Qd1 Nf8 17. Nb5 Bb8 18. dxc5 bxc5
>>>>>>19. Ng4 Nxg4 20. Qxg4 a6 21. Na3 Nh7 22. Bc3 Nf6 23. Qf5 d4 24. exd4 Rxe1 25.
>>>>>>Rxe1 cxd4 26. Bd2 Rc6 27. Ba5 Qd6 28. Nc4 Qxf4 29. Qxf4 Bxf4 30. Bb6 Be3+ 31.
>>>>>>Nxe3 Rxb6 32. Nc4 Re6 33. Rxe6 fxe6 34. Nd6 Bd5 35. a3 a5 36. b4 axb4 37. axb4
>>>>>>Kf8 38. b5 Ke7 39. Nc4 Bxc4 40. Bxc4 e5 41. Kf2 Kd6 42. Kf3 Kc5 43. Bd3 43...
>>>>>>Kd5 {0-1 Tatarczak,J-Mlacnik,F/EU-ch02 blind 1999/EXT 2000}) 10. g4 $40 10...
>>>>>>Nxg4 11. Rg1 11... Ndf6 $6 {Ein seltsam anmutender Zug. Weiss uebernimmt nun
>>>>>>vollends die Initiative! Ein seltasm anmutender Zug. Ich denke dass ab da
>>>>>>schwarz ums Remis kaempfen muss.} 12. h3 Nh6 13. e4 $1 13... dxe4 14. Bxh6 exd3
>>>>>>15. Rxg7+ Kh8 16. Qxd3 Rg8 17. Rxg8+ 17... Nxg8 $1 {Bis hierher nun alles
>>>>>>forciert. Deiser Springerzug ist der einzige der die Stellung rettet.} 18. Bf4
>>>>>>f6 19. O-O-O 19... Bd6 $6 $14 (19... Qd7 $5 $11) 20. Qe3 Bxf4 21. Qxf4 21...
>>>>>>Bxh3 {Das haette fast jedes Programm gespielt.} 22. Rg1 Qb8 23. Qe3 Qd6 24. Nh4
>>>>>>$1 24... Be6 25. Rh1 Rd8 26. Ng6+ Kg7 27. Nf4 Bf5 28. Nce2 Ne7 29. Ng3 Kh8 30.
>>>>>>Nxf5 Nxf5 31. Qe4 31... Qd7
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Check the possible continuation after move 31...Qd7 32.Ng6+ etc.............
>>>>>>31....Qd7 32.Ng6+ Kg7 33 Nf4 Kh8 34.Ng6+ Kg7 35.Nf4 Kh8 36.1/2
>>>
>>>>>>[D]3r3k/p2q3p/1pp2p2/5n2/3PQN2/8/PP3P2/2K4R w - - 0 0
>
>What I don't understand is your response, as if was a ridiculous Analysis made
>by me two minutes prior to Kasparov making the blundering move, instead of
>chosing to Draw.
>
>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?280576
>
>Pichard.
I'm a bit confused as to exactly what you mean about what. If you analyzed a win
for DJ before the blunder, and then a blunder occured, so that might have been
prophetic, but not a correct analysis. When I said Draw, I was then convinced
there was nothing better that would come out of it, assuming of course there
were not going to be mistakes.
S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.