Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 04:10:52 01/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2003 at 06:42:32, Uri Blass wrote: >a good idea for the future. >The idea is that every team is going to have the head of the team that decide >about the move but the head may allow other people to give advices. > >I also think that fisher time control 120 minutes per game+120 seconds per move >may be better so players will have always time to discuss about tactical lines. > >A team can be productive but the head of the team should decide about rules who >is allowed to suggest moves and when(otherwise it may be a chaos). > > >Kasparov could avoid tactical mistakes because other people could warn him that >the move is a blunder. > >Team of computer can be also productive and I imagine the following discussion >between shredder and Junior in game 2. > >Junior:b4 axb3 Rxa7 bxc2... > >Shredder:You are doing a tactical mistake(please play the first 4 moves in your >pv analyze the position after them and go back and learn from your analysis) > > > >I think that it may be interesting if people who watch the match will be able to >see the discussions of computers and humans(of course computers that are >involved should be able to see only the discussion of themselves and the same >for humans who are involved). > >Uri I dont like this idea and it is not realistc. Kasparov would never agree. We (relative bad "over-the-board" chessplayers) would crush New Yorks Deep Junior with the help of Fritz engine (1 GhZ Computer would be enough) and opening database. DJ plays a lot of incorrect moves no other top engine would play. DJ8 will do great in SSDF because most engines are not able to refute his moves.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.