Author: Graham Laight
Date: 04:47:11 01/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2003 at 07:36:43, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 31, 2003 at 07:29:29, Graham Laight wrote: > >>On January 31, 2003 at 07:17:38, Uri Blass wrote: >>>I did not try to play but logic tells me exactly the opposite. >>> >>>when the number of guesses is small the computer can know what most humans do in >>>that situation and hide a coin in the second hand so if I am in the majority I >>>will lose. >> >>That's like saying that one could win a chess game against the majority of >>people with a standardised sequence of moves! > >The point is that in chess there are more possibilities and here there are only >2 possibilities for each move. > >I believe that if a lot of people played you can have the best move for the >computer in the first 10 moves so at least in these moves I expect to lose but >maybe I should try( but I am not optimistic about beating the computer in 49 >level) The trouble with using a small opening book is that once an opponent has learned this book, they'll win again and again! My aspiration for this game is that it will KEEP winning! >I doubt if it can take 2 minutes if I think about every move. If you're lucky, you can still win - even without much thought - at 49 moves. >Uri Go on - have a go - you KNOW you want to... :) http://mysite.freeserve.com/grahamlaight/jscript/GuessWhichHand.htm -g
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.