Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: GK v DJ Does NOT Represent A Battle Of Intelligence - Economist

Author: Peter Kasinski

Date: 06:03:35 01/31/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 30, 2003 at 13:10:47, Matthew Hull wrote:

>On January 30, 2003 at 12:58:29, Graham Laight wrote:
>
>>Our favourite chess match of the week is the subject of the TOP ARTICLE in this
>>week's Economist (which has just come out on the web), in which they make the
>>case that chess playing ability does not represent intelligence. Of course -
>>followers of AI will know that as a computer masters an ability, that skill no
>>longer qualifies as intelligence. Until there's nothing left that humans can do
>>better than computers! :)
>>
>><Quote>
>>THE idea that chess-playing skill is a proxy for machine intelligence is not
>>new. It goes back as far as 1770, when Wolfgang von Kempelen, a Hungarian
>>inventor, unveiled a wooden, clockwork-powered mannekin at the court of Maria
>>Theresa, Empress of Austria-Hungary. This machine, known as the Turk because of
>>its exotic costume, could play chess, moving the pieces with a mechanical arm
>>and defeating even the best human players. It was, of course, a trick—a hidden
>>human operator controlled the automaton's movements—but some observers equated
>>its chess prowess with intelligence.
>></Quote>
>>
>>To read the rest of the article, click here -->
>>http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1559988
>
>
>Perhaps a distinction should be made.  They way humans go about solving a
>problem at the board does require intelligence in the classical sense.  However,
>they way in which computers go about solving the problem has everything to do
>with the intelligence of the programmers, and nothing to do with the supposed
>intelligence of the adding machine that's running a chess program or the chess
>program itself.
>
>A procedure has no intelligence of it's own.  All the intelligence is with the
>one arranging the procedure.
>
>Regards,
>Matt

Intelligence is often attributed in funny way. I remember someone (from IBM as a
matter of fact!) telling me that the one truly artificially intelligent thing in
this world is a thermos bottle. It keeps warm things warm, and it keeps cold
things cold. How does it know?

:-)

PK





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.