Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The naked truth: chess is 100% tactics

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 06:07:53 01/31/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 31, 2003 at 09:01:14, Uri Blass wrote:

>On January 31, 2003 at 08:16:05, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>On January 31, 2003 at 05:01:20, Francesco Di Tolla wrote:
>>
>>>Kasparov once told that chess is 100% tactics.
>>>
>>>Well saying that after Rxg7 in game 3 white is better because he has the
>>>initiative is not a tactical reasoning and Deep Junior has shown to us that
>>>sometimes, supported by pure calculations, one can enter in a position like that
>>>on the board after Nh6. This looks like a position that only a "human patzer"
>>>would play, and still DJ held it against Kasparov.
>>>
>>>The lesson is that we can continue to use positional evaluations as a
>>>shortcoming to actual calculations, as any GM does in his "pattern-matching"
>>>scan of each position on the board. But computers can do better with 100%
>>>tactics.
>>>
>>>What I like of this match is that Kapsarov is playing almost as he does in
>>>trounaments, I hope he will not switch stile after this defeat.
>>>
>>>Actually I think that an anticomputer strategy is still possible, as the games
>>>by some minor player show, based on extreme-long term planning, but will work
>>>only sometimes, and other times you'll be the victim of your long term planning.
>>>
>>>bye
>>>Franz
>>
>>
>>This is all big nonsense. And I am sure that you would not follow your own guide
>>lines if you had to fight for your life. We_know_ for sure that the position was
>>bad for Black.
>
>
>How can you be sure about it?
>
>I am not sure about my knolwedge of which side is better.
>I believe that humans often have wrong knolwedge.
>
>I do not claim that in that case the opinion of humans that white was better is
>wrong but we have no data to be sure.
>
>Uri

I rarely agree with Rolf, but this time I do, he's correct, BLACK should have
LOST!

Kasparov missed 14.Bxe4! and he also played the weaker 15.Rxg7+?....Bxg7 was
better!

Then he blundered in a drawn position, with 32.Rh5?? costing the game!

Terry



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.