Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 08:22:21 01/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2003 at 11:10:56, Graham Laight wrote: >On January 31, 2003 at 11:02:29, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On January 31, 2003 at 10:48:43, Graham Laight wrote: >> >>>On January 31, 2003 at 10:35:56, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>On January 31, 2003 at 10:33:53, Graham Laight wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 31, 2003 at 10:25:20, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 31, 2003 at 10:19:57, Graham Laight wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On January 31, 2003 at 08:46:53, Fernando Alonso wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I urge you to have a go! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>It'll only take you 2 minutes at the default 49 level. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>http://mysite.freeserve.com/grahamlaight/jscript/GuessWhichHand.htm >>>>>>>>>(works fine under IE - Netscape fault will be fixed over the weekend) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>-g >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Uri >>>>>>>>Here is a 201 win. You have it also on your mailbox :) >>>>>>>>It was fun playing against it. I just tried to think what your program would >>>>>>>>thik i was thinking :) >>>>>>>>The more guesses i took the harder it became to beat it, you pattern recognition >>>>>>>>works very well ! >>>>>>>>Regards, >>>>>>>>Fernando Alonso. >>>>>>>>L1 L0 L0 L0 L1 L1 R1 L0 L1 R1 R1 L1 R0 R1 R1 R1 L1 R0 R1 R1 R0 R1 L1 R1 L1 R1 R1 >>>>>>>>R1 L0 L1 L1 L0 L0 L1 L1 L1 L1 L0 R0 L0 R0 R1 R0 R1 R0 R1 L1 L0 R0 R1 R1 R0 R1 R1 >>>>>>>>L1 R1 R0 R1 R0 R0 R1 R0 L1 R1 L0 R1 R1 L0 L1 L0 L0 L0 L0 L0 L0 R1 L0 L0 R0 L0 L1 >>>>>>>>L0 L1 R1 R0 R1 R0 R0 L1 R1 L1 R0 L0 R0 L0 R1 R0 L1 R1 L0 R0 R0 R0 R0 R0 R0 R0 R1 >>>>>>>>R1 R1 R0 R0 L0 R1 L1 L1 R0 R1 L1 R1 R1 L1 R0 R1 L1 L0 R0 R0 L1 R0 R1 R1 R0 R0 R1 >>>>>>>>R1 L1 R0 R0 L0 R0 R0 R0 R0 L1 R1 L1 L1 L0 L1 L1 R0 R1 R0 L1 R1 R1 R1 R1 L1 R0 L1 >>>>>>>>L0 R0 R1 R0 L1 L0 R0 R1 R0 R0 L1 L1 L1 L1 L0 R0 R1 R0 R0 L0 R1 R0 R0 R0 R0 R0 L1 >>>>>>>>L1 R1 L1 R1 L0 R0 R1 L1 R1 L0 R0 R0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Thankyou very much for playing at this level. I have to say - you are actually a >>>>>>>better player than me - and I wrote the damn game! :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Anyway - although you felt you were struggling later on, your 2nd half results >>>>>>>were by no means disgraceful. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Overall you won by 105-96 - a very good score! Clearly some good games players >>>>>>>at CCC! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>In the first half, you won by a creditable 55-45. You lost in the 2nd half - but >>>>>>>only by 50-51 - which hardly constitutes proof that the web page was then >>>>>>>outplaying you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Congratulations! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>-g >>>>>> >>>>>>L0 L1 L1 L1 R0 R0 L1 R0 L1 R0 L1 L0 L1 L1 R1 R1 R0 L0 L1 L0 L1 R1 R0 R0 L1 L1 L1 >>>>>>R1 R0 R0 L0 R1 L0 R0 R1 L0 R0 R1 R1 R0 L1 L0 L0 L0 R1 L0 R0 L1 L1 >>>>>> >>>>>>I won by one over 40 try's (this was my first try) >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards >>>>>>Jonas >>>>> >>>>>You won by 25-24 - congratulations! Now try a larger number of goes, please... >>>>>:) >>>>> >>>>>-g >>>> >>>>Here you go 201 try's: >>>> >>>>L1 L1 L1 R0 R0 L0 R1 R1 R1 R1 L0 L1 L1 R1 R1 R1 L0 L0 R0 L0 R1 R0 L1 R0 R0 L0 L1 >>>>L1 L1 R0 L1 L1 L0 L0 R1 L0 R1 R0 L1 L1 L1 R1 R0 L1 L0 L1 L1 R0 L1 R1 R0 L1 L0 R1 >>>>R1 L1 R1 R0 R0 L0 L1 L0 R1 R1 R0 L0 L1 L0 R1 L0 R1 R0 R1 R0 R1 L0 R1 L1 L0 L1 R0 >>>>L0 L1 L0 L1 L1 L1 R0 L1 R1 R0 L0 L0 L0 R1 L0 R0 L0 R0 L1 L0 R1 R0 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 >>>>R0 L1 R1 R0 L0 L1 L0 L0 L0 R0 R0 L0 L1 L0 L1 L0 L1 R0 L1 L0 R1 R1 R0 L1 L0 R1 R1 >>>>L0 L0 L1 L1 L0 L1 R0 L1 R1 R0 R0 R1 R1 R0 L1 L0 R0 R0 R0 R1 L0 L0 R0 R1 L1 L1 L0 >>>>R0 L1 L0 R1 L0 R1 R0 L1 L0 L1 L1 L1 R0 R1 L1 L1 L0 R0 R1 R0 L1 L1 L0 L1 R0 L1 L0 >>>>R0 L0 L0 L0 L1 L1 L0 L0 L1 L1 L0 R0 >>>> >>>>I won by 5 103 - 98 >>>> >>>>This is getting addictive :) >>>> >>>>Regards >>>>Jonas >>> >>>Bloody hell - either I'm the worst player of this game in the world, or people >>>out there are not admitting to their defeats! :) >>> >>>Anyway - you won easily in the 1st half, 54-46, but in the 2nd half you lost >>>49-52, which implies that the web page had some degree of success in learning >>>your playing style. >>> >>>-g >> >>To be quite honest this was my first two try's, i am sure though that with >>enough games i would lose more than i would win, like most people. >> >>It seems that the # of left's are greater than the # right's which gave me quite >>a lead at some point, maybe you could check what the highest margain was? >> >>(i think i was leading with a margain of 15 at some point) >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >You are correct - in your game you guessed left 118 times, and right only 83 >times. > >I have thought of some ways in which I can improve the computer's performance in >this game - and I might just implement them over the weekend. Unfortuantely, >since this game hasn't been studied as deeply as chess, I don't know how good it >is possible to get at this game. It doesn't help that I personally seem to be a >"below average" player... > >-g Maybe a way to improve it would be to (if possible) make 2 windows based programs who would play eachother on the computer and generate statistics based on their games against eachother, and then later impliment a learing function in only one of the two programs which played the statistic generating matches and see if the one with a learning function would fare significantly better with learning? The learning function in the engine should of course be able to read the produced statistics from their previous games. This would, again if possible, give you a much better understanding of how to improve on your website "engine". Regards Jonas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.