Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 15:45:11 01/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2003 at 18:40:15, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On January 31, 2003 at 11:05:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 31, 2003 at 07:56:58, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>As a careful scientist I can present the following results. The details of my >>>method must remain secret, but you are invited to read CTFfor example. >>> >>>The actual program against Kasparov for the first time in history played for all >>>the psyche of a concrete human opponent. We know that Kasparov believes in >>>magic. Numbers are very important for him as symbols for something coming from a >>>hidden world. So in consequence Kasparov believes in the super-natural of chess. >>>Now what DEEP JUNIOR has done in game three is giving Kasparov the perception of >>>a position that is completely lost for the computer side. In front of a castled >>>King Kasparov saw two Knights on f6 and h6. Not enough, he had an open g-file >>>against such a configuration! And his own King could still castle to the Queen's >>>side! Three officers were directed against Black's King-side. Queen and two >>>Bishops! The black King might have felt like Israel in front of the Arab World. >>> >>>But did Kasparov EVER have such a winning position against a human opponent? Of >>>course not because only patzers would play like that. And against patzers you >>>don't need your best chess. Here is the secret of the actual design of the >>>Israeli computer program. What would happen if Kasparov had to win such a won >>>position against precise calculations on the border of the allowed and possible >>>in chess? Is he prepared for such a challenge? Of course not! >> >> >>You are making one assumption that may turn out to be faulty: "The position >>was winning for white after g4 Nxg4". >> >>It looked dangerous for black. But "looks" don't win against a computer. >>Against a human, black might well have "folded". Just as surely as Kasparov >>folded near the end of the game. But a computer generally won't, and during the >>game no computer ever thought white was up by as much as a whole pawn. So it >>might just be a case of something looking dangerous but not really being >>dangerous. >> >>Computers are known for their ability to handle such positions very well, and >>the inherent problem in such positions is that quite often, there is a very >>fine line to walk as the position is played by both sides. Anytime you put >>a human in a position where he has _one_ good choice, and _lots_ of fair to >>bad choices, for many moves, the probability of a single mistake goes way up, >>and what we saw in game three happens. >> >>Ng6+ was a solid drawing move, but Kasparov either (a) missed it (which seems >>unlikely) or (b) he thought the rook move gave him winning chances, without >>enough time to really analyze carefully. Whichever reason really doesn't >>matter that much. If you are the world's best "minesweeper" you still take >>a chance every time you walk on to a minefield... > >I believe that Gary not draw to play wanted and therefore Rh5 played. The cause >lies in my opinion into game 2. There Gary has one win line missed and thus >wanted it into game 3 to _absolutely_ win! :) Yes, Eduard, aber Bob versteht ja gar nicht, daß Garry in Nummer 2 gewinnen konnte. Er glaubt, daß Garry echt Glück gehabt hat gegen DJ noch diesen Remisweg gefunden zu haben... <grins> Yes Eduard, but Bob only sees that Garry could draw in Game Two, but not win. Bob thinks that Garry was lucky in finding a way out in Game Two when DJ was almost winning. <g> Rolf Tueschen > > >> >>> >>>So this is the answer how David could still beat Goliath. Big super powers have >>>to control a huge traffic of their own while little David must only concentrate >>>on the strategically weakest spaces and entities of the enemy. Perhaps we have >>>seen the birth of a new chess pattern. After the famous Nf8 position that often >>>can defend the whole Kingside for Black we have now the Nh6 position. This is >>>chess of the third thousand. It is worth more than three times Las Vegas. >>> >>>Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.