Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 18:18:04 01/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2003 at 20:09:51, Matt Taylor wrote: >On January 31, 2003 at 16:55:51, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On January 31, 2003 at 15:30:02, Lei , Shiann-Tzong wrote: >> >>>On January 31, 2003 at 14:19:22, Vladik wrote: >>> >>>>I bought AMD Athlon XP2400+ and on my pc shows 2.0 GHz is that right ? >>>>And do i need any configration in Bios or to leave it defoult settings ? >>>> >>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>>my hardware: >>>> >>>>AMD Athlon XP2400+ >>>>Asus A7S333 >>>>Samsung(333 mhz) 256 DDR >>>>Win XP Prof. >>>> >>>>I tested Fritzmrk under Fritz 7 Gui with Fritz 7.0.0.8 with 32 mb hash and the >>>>kn/s is: 1100 kn/s per second. >>>> >>>> >>>>I wonder that is everything okay or there is something wrong ? >>>> >>>>Thanks in advance >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>>Vladik >>> >>>Dual Xeon 2.0Ghz can get 4200 fritzmark . About 4000 Kn/s >> >>Something is wrong here, by what you say you should get over 2000 Kn/s on a >>single 2 Ghz Xeon?? that can't be right. >> >>(I assume you used DF7 for your fritzmark?) >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >Somebody else posted that a 2.4 GHz Pentium 4 scored 950 Kn/s. Therefore a dual >2.4 GHz Xeon would score somewhere below 1900 Kn/s. The only explanation for an >aberration is that other assumptions were violated. This may be effects from a >larger cache, or it could be a different type of ram, different hash table size, >or any number of things. > >It would be useful if those sorts of variables were posted alongside the >benchmark data. Otherwise the only conclusion that can be drawn is that all 3 >systems are fast. > >-Matt No matter what RAM or cache it has a dual 2.0 Ghz xeon could not outperform a dual 2.4 Ghz with more than a 100%, atleast not the way i see it, Hyatt, Slater can you enlighten me? Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.