Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 21:00:47 01/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2003 at 22:54:37, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 31, 2003 at 21:18:04, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On January 31, 2003 at 20:09:51, Matt Taylor wrote: >> >>>On January 31, 2003 at 16:55:51, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>On January 31, 2003 at 15:30:02, Lei , Shiann-Tzong wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 31, 2003 at 14:19:22, Vladik wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I bought AMD Athlon XP2400+ and on my pc shows 2.0 GHz is that right ? >>>>>>And do i need any configration in Bios or to leave it defoult settings ? >>>>>> >>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>>my hardware: >>>>>> >>>>>>AMD Athlon XP2400+ >>>>>>Asus A7S333 >>>>>>Samsung(333 mhz) 256 DDR >>>>>>Win XP Prof. >>>>>> >>>>>>I tested Fritzmrk under Fritz 7 Gui with Fritz 7.0.0.8 with 32 mb hash and the >>>>>>kn/s is: 1100 kn/s per second. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>I wonder that is everything okay or there is something wrong ? >>>>>> >>>>>>Thanks in advance >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards, >>>>>>Vladik >>>>> >>>>>Dual Xeon 2.0Ghz can get 4200 fritzmark . About 4000 Kn/s >>>> >>>>Something is wrong here, by what you say you should get over 2000 Kn/s on a >>>>single 2 Ghz Xeon?? that can't be right. >>>> >>>>(I assume you used DF7 for your fritzmark?) >>>> >>>>Regards >>>>Jonas >>> >>>Somebody else posted that a 2.4 GHz Pentium 4 scored 950 Kn/s. Therefore a dual >>>2.4 GHz Xeon would score somewhere below 1900 Kn/s. The only explanation for an >>>aberration is that other assumptions were violated. This may be effects from a >>>larger cache, or it could be a different type of ram, different hash table size, >>>or any number of things. >>> >>>It would be useful if those sorts of variables were posted alongside the >>>benchmark data. Otherwise the only conclusion that can be drawn is that all 3 >>>systems are fast. >>> >>>-Matt >> >>No matter what RAM or cache it has a dual 2.0 Ghz xeon could not outperform a >>dual 2.4 Ghz with more than a 100%, atleast not the way i see it, Hyatt, Slater >>can you enlighten me? >> >>Regards >>Jonas > > >I can't help much. I have a dual 2.8 xeon that runs the crafty benchmark at >2.1M nodes per second under linux. I have no idea how fast fritz would run >on this box however... Deep Fritz 7 mark on my Dual AMD 1600+ is around 1400 Kn/s Crafty 19.02 does 1.284.735 nodes That would translate into this (roughly): On your machine according to my benchmarks, Deep Fritz 7 would do around 2500 Kn/s and you run with 2 x 2.8 Ghz, his friend only have a 2 x 2.0 Ghz... The point is that Lei is claiming that Deep Fritz mark on his friends dual 2.0 Ghz Xeon is a little under 4000 Kn/s i find it hard to believe that a single Xeon 2.0 Ghz would outperform My Dual AMD... Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.