Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 15:15:29 02/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2003 at 17:59:12, Bob Durrett wrote: > >What would happen if Kasparov were to follow Botvinnik's footsteps and become >genuinely interested in improving computer chess? > >What if: > >(1) Professor Hyatt and a team of the top chess engine programmers were to give >Kasparov an intensive short course [24 hours per day for 6 months] in chess >engine programming and Kasparov were to become addicted to chess engine design? > >(2) Kasparov were to then become pro-active in trying to help the chess engine >programmers to improve their chess engines? > >Generally, it has already been established here that relatively weak >chessplayers can produce strong chess engines. But what could Kasparov, in >partnership with the likes of Hyatt, produce? > >Maybe the recent mistakes made by Fritz and Junior would not happen anymore. > >What do you think? > >Bob D. Here's the official answer, but please don't be too surprised. K could tell them a lot of good things about chess. But all that can't be programmed. Period. That was already clear in the seventies when Huebner visited MIT. So that is moot. Rolf Tueschen Kasparov could tell them a
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.