Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 22:37:55 02/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2003 at 00:00:29, Matt Taylor wrote: >On February 01, 2003 at 09:55:49, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On February 01, 2003 at 05:36:03, Drexel,Michael wrote: >> >>>On February 01, 2003 at 04:42:06, Lei , Shiann-Tzong wrote: >>> >>>>On February 01, 2003 at 02:21:10, Ernst Walet wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 31, 2003 at 20:22:03, Lei , Shiann-Tzong wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>http://www.geocities.com/sainzlei/fritzmark.jpg >>>>>> >>>>>>It's a Deep Fritz 7 benchmark >>>>>> >>>>>>speed nodes : 3877 Kn/s >>>>>>Value : 4058 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Sorry, but when I look at the different fonts used, the picture seems fake to >>>>>me. >>>>> >>>>>Ernst. >>>> >>>>I have no any reason to lie you ! >>>> >>>>When my friend buy a 4 xeon mp computer , i will post fritzmark picture again !! >>>>4 * XEON MP 2.0Ghz can reach over 8000 Kn/s . >>> >>>everyone at CCC knows that this is impossible, so please stop posting this >>>Nonsense. >> >>It might be true if someone could overclock one of those processors to about >>5Ghz. :-) > >They will reach 5 GHz by the end of this year. SMP always lags behind >single-processor, though. > >However, in less than a year, I'll be posting results from Athlon64 that make a >quad P4 2 GHz look pitiful. > >-Matt Someone sent me some Crafty results from one of these (quad 2ghz) and the nps was roughly 4.0M, which was not bad. If a single Athlon64 breaks that speed barrier, it will be one hell of a processor. The best 1ghz Mckinley numbers I have seen is in the 1.6M nps range, roughly...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.