Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 00:27:50 02/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2003 at 00:51:34, Amir Ban wrote:
>On February 01, 2003 at 20:44:48, John Merlino wrote:
>
>>On February 01, 2003 at 20:14:09, Amir Ban wrote:
>>
>>Great comments! Thanks, Amir!
>>
>>One thought, though.... After this comment of yours:
>>
>>>11... Ndf6 12. h3 Nh6 13. e4 dxe4
>>>
>>>{This looks very dangerous now, but Deep Junior is not concerned. Evaluations
>>>are level, and not falling. Every iteration that doesn't bring a massive
>>>fail-low is a relief}
>>>
>>>14. Bxh6
>>>
>>>{We expected 14. Bxe4 Kh8 15. Bxh6 gxh6 16. Bxc6 Rb8 17. Qd2 Bxh3 18. Qxh6 Bg4
>>>with advantage for white}
>>
>>[D]r1bq1rk1/p3bppp/1pp2n1n/8/3Pp3/2NB1N1P/PPQB1P2/R3K1R1 w Q - 0 14
>>
>>I put this position (before 14.Bxe4) into Chessmaster 9000 (on a slow P3-733),
>>and it agrees with DJ's analysis up to 17.Qd2. However, the evals ARE getting
>>better for White with each iteration:
<snip>
>>2:06 2/11 1.08 10059181 14.Bxe4 Kh8 15.Bxh6 gxh6 16.Bxc6
>> Rb8 17.Qd2 Rg8 18.O-O-O Bxh3 19.Qxh6
>> Be6 20.Ne5
>
>In the last 3 PV's it seems to me that 17...Rg8 is a weak move whose purpose is
>unclear to me. 19... Be6 is also weak (Bg4 better), actually losing to 20. d5
I suggest more analysis after 14. Bxe4 Kh8 15. Bxh6 gxh6 16. Bxc6 Rb8 17. Qd2,
because it's not clear what the best defense is. I suspect with a long search,
white will be shown to be clearly winning.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.