Author: Will Singleton
Date: 20:22:57 02/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2003 at 23:11:21, Brian Richardson wrote: >On February 02, 2003 at 21:18:45, Will Singleton wrote: > >>Bob indicated that he didn't mind if other comps auto-kib in ch 211. It looked >>like three or four comps were doing that today. I personally think it's fine, >>the more the merrier. Sometimes the lines are very different, and thus >>interesting to compare. >> >>Any dissenters? >> >>Will > >I would also like to see other engine's evals... > >Hopefully with a verbosity variable (ala Crafty) to skip output >until several million nodes have been searched to some >reasonable depth. > >Also, the + always for white vs + for side on move is annoying. > >I personally prefer + for side on move, since I tend to think of + >as "better", rather than having to translate to a color. > >I'm not asking anyone to change their orientation, but when kibbing >it would be helpful to know what a "+" score means. > >Brian My preference for kibbing on third-party games would be to use + for white, and - for black. That is how both crafty and amateur do it now. When you have a program commenting on a game in which it is not participating, then it makes no sense to switch its orientation depending on the side to move. *That* would be confusing. So, I suggest for ch 211, please kib in white/black orientation. Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.