Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 06:46:50 02/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2003 at 09:23:46, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 03, 2003 at 08:49:01, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On February 03, 2003 at 07:47:00, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On February 03, 2003 at 07:36:32, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>On February 02, 2003 at 23:34:14, Terry McCracken wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 02, 2003 at 09:50:33, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>My chess friend Terry, >>>>>> >>>>>>please leave me alone. You know that you can't understand most messages I write. >>>>>>So simply don't read it. You wanted me to accept you as an adult, but how could >>>>>>I if you make such messages. Also the wasted energy - it's really frightening >>>>>>me. You should concentrate on chess and computerchess. >>>>>> >>>>>>In that sense, >>>>>>Rolf Tueschen >>>>>> >>>>>I understand you all to well Rolf! >>>>> >>>>>>(It's sad that people can no longer read your evil insults in the thread about >>>>>>Columbia tragedy. Then you finally asked me a deal and I agreed. But then you >>>>>>start again today. I called you dyslectic but now you are losing your own memory >>>>>>as it seems...) >>>>> >>>>>I made no insults whatsover, about the Columbia tragedy? What in God's Name >>>>>are you talking about Rolf?! >>>>> >>>>>I have a photographic memory Rolf BTW. >>>> >>>>If you are making the assertion that I'm Cummings, you're are not only wrong, >>>>it's libel, all of it! >>> >>>Leave me alone, kid. >> >>Then stop reffering to me as "Kid", that is extremely disrespectful. >>> >>>You wrote about me: "fascist pig". Is that not an insult? >> >>Yep, in CTF after a long fight, I did indeed call you a "Fascist Pig", I >>shouldn't have, but I did. >> >>I apologise for that crude remark. It was inappropriate. I retract my insult. >>> >>>Go on, let's see how lonh moderation will protect you. >> >>Rolf we were both moderated. I never did read your reply, when I offered you >>an "Olive Branch", as it was deleted. >> >>> >>>Rolf Tueschen >> >> >>I offer you this gesture of peace again. Will you accept? >> >>Terry McCracken First of all you did insult me HERE in CCC IMO. But no matter of the insult I had accepted your message and my answer went like that: [by heart] ------------- My dear chess friend Terry, of course I accept no deal needed. But I must insist that it wasn't me who started to be condenscating but you started to jump into threads and on messages from me that you couldn't understand. [etc pp] --------------------- But after the tone of your message above I won't repeat that message until you really leave me alone. At least when you are not 100% sure that you can understand the topic. Because most of the time you can't. That is also the reason why I react on your insults with the term "kid". Because that is the smoothest possibility to react on stupidity. Otherwise I had to shout back, but this is not my style. Ah, I remember now that I also invited you to concentrate on chess and CC because there you might have a better understanding. And you already agreed with me in a certain topic. As to the alleged "Cummings" topic, I did never write that you were Cummings. What I wrote is that you are a pseudonym and that the moderation however supports you. More they are sure that you are not a fake. Then I discussed why I thought different. First, if you were not a fake, then we had to debate why a person with such a lack of understanding and good manners always jumped in debates of highly educated people. Second only in the faking under a pseudo name I see a reason to behave like that. Namely to inspire a livelys debate. And therefore it seems logical that the moderation supports you. The support goes so far that if I would send them the number of the fascist pig insult they would begin to discuss, what I wanted. If they should delete it etc. But I do never want that something should be deleted. I had hoped that someone who does insult on a daily base should be warned and then banned. Just like many before. BTW not me. But I can remember Thorsten C. Compared with your insult "fascis pig", Thorsten did never write sonething comparable. So that is all a bit complicated for me. You must have a high reputation among the officials here. And exactly this is for me the proof that you under that name are a real no-name in CCC. And you surely are. At least I bet a fortune on that one. So let me end this with the tell, that you might leave me alone and if you do that we can surely meet each other on chess or CC topics. And then I surely have no longer a reason to name you as "kid". But you should begin now. As I said I already had answered you and others might have seen it here. Bwcause the header was exactly My dear chess friend Terry. Rolf Tueschen P.S. I won't answer again here because this is NOW absolutely OT.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.