Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 09:59:42 02/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2003 at 12:42:58, Sune Fischer wrote: >On February 03, 2003 at 12:26:30, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>On February 03, 2003 at 12:18:08, J Mike wrote: >> >>> >>>>This is only _partially_ true. It is _also_ there because of the computer. >>>>Remove the >>>>computer and who is going to put up $1M for a 6 game match with Kasparov vs >>>>_anybody_??? >>> >>>Why? What was the prize fund for Kasparov vs Short (London match) and Kasparov >>>vs Anand (New York match)? .. >>> >>>What would be the prize fund for Kasparov vs Ponomoriov? >>> >>>When Kasparov is playing, there is money. Without him there is none. >> >>No, you misunderstood that. >> >>When Kasparov is playing, there is a _demand_ for money. ;) The computer team >>(or whoever the sponsors are) _delivers_ the money. (to Kasparov :) > >Nothing wrong that, the guy knows what he is worth. Just think of all the paper >articles (maybe even headlines) this generates around the world. Some will rub >off on Junior so of course Kaparov is not going to sell his branded name >cheaply. No other chessplayer (besides maybe Fischer) could get that much >attention. > >And don't forget Schumacher gets 1 Billion a year, good football playes easily >get 10 Mill a year, Garry gets 1 mill one and a while and this is too much??? I've waited for that one for years! The point is this. All these stars get much money but then? They also do something for their own education to make a good appearence in public! But with Kasparov, ok, he also gets new clothes, but he simply can't change his speech center! I counted just a few incredible statements and contradictions. Perhaps that is Aserbeidjan culture, who knows, but you normally don't insult you partners who organized such a bunch of money. Look, in 97 I was pro Kasparov because I found the second game till now strange. But what he now told us about the 6th game and here about the first three games is crap. 97 crap: If he were out why he still made such experiments in the opening. 2003 crap: If the games were won then why Kasparov didn't win? The whole question is nonsense of course because I know why he didn't win. Because he's paid for a promotion. But his argumentation is incredible. Perhaps, just perhaps, he really thinks that must say such nonsense to appear as a real fighter against the comp team when in real they are all buddies. Either way round it's a cheat. Arrogant cheat. Because let the knowies know, but don't give such a schizo appearence so that everybody gets confused included Kasparov! LOL I mean show bizz is like show bizz. But don't take experts for a ride and worship an average program as a new heroe with GAMES who speak their own language, namely that Kasparov again wasn't prepared and was not willing to win or draw. Rolf Tueschen > >-S. > >>Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.