Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:59:46 02/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2003 at 03:34:51, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On February 02, 2003 at 23:11:21, Brian Richardson wrote: > >[snip] > >>Also, the + always for white vs + for side on move is annoying. >> >>I personally prefer + for side on move, since I tend to think of + >>as "better", rather than having to translate to a color. >> >>I'm not asking anyone to change their orientation, but when kibbing >>it would be helpful to know what a "+" score means. > >The obvious solution would be to do it the way LambChop does it.. that is, >saying for what side the score is. "1.2 for white" or "2.5 for black" is >absolutely clear for everyone. Why not more people use this scheme escapes me. > >If 3 or more engines post their eval in the 211 channel and they don't have the >same meaning for + and - scores, half of the tells in this channel will be a >discussion what means what for what engine - making the 211 channel useless for >me at least. > >Sargon > >PS. Oh yes, and the filtering-scheme on ICC could be improved too - as long as >we can't filter messages individually, 'set kibitz 2' is a must :( Actually you can filter selectively. It is called "+censor". But there were so many morons producing noise it was quite a chore to censor them all...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.