Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 11:12:10 02/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2003 at 13:59:46, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 03, 2003 at 03:34:51, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>On February 02, 2003 at 23:11:21, Brian Richardson wrote: >> >>[snip] >> >>>Also, the + always for white vs + for side on move is annoying. >>> >>>I personally prefer + for side on move, since I tend to think of + >>>as "better", rather than having to translate to a color. >>> >>>I'm not asking anyone to change their orientation, but when kibbing >>>it would be helpful to know what a "+" score means. >> >>The obvious solution would be to do it the way LambChop does it.. that is, >>saying for what side the score is. "1.2 for white" or "2.5 for black" is >>absolutely clear for everyone. Why not more people use this scheme escapes me. >> >>If 3 or more engines post their eval in the 211 channel and they don't have the >>same meaning for + and - scores, half of the tells in this channel will be a >>discussion what means what for what engine - making the 211 channel useless for >>me at least. >> >>Sargon >> >>PS. Oh yes, and the filtering-scheme on ICC could be improved too - as long as >>we can't filter messages individually, 'set kibitz 2' is a must :( > > >Actually you can filter selectively. It is called "+censor". But there were so >many >morons producing noise it was quite a chore to censor them all... It would be cool for such games to have the GM/IM channel where only their comments are allowed. Then just tune in to that and lose the moron chatter altogether. Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.