Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:57:36 02/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2003 at 11:12:09, Rolf Tueschen wrote: [snip] >I see no logic in Kasparov's arguments. He lost to DB2 due to the stuff in game >2 after that he was out of the match. Then in 2003 he plays a program over 100 >times slower than DB2, agains loses and again begins to behave unconfortably. >Although it's just a promotion for the Israeli program. He says that he was >winning in principal all three games. He probably was winning. But that's how it is against computers. You have a commanding position. You make brilliant, positional moves. You hone in on an idea about which the computer has no clue. Then you make the tiniest little slip and some ultra deep combination costs you one pawn and the computer grinds you into powder in the endgame. [snip]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.