Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 16:14:36 02/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2003 at 19:02:42, John Merlino wrote: >On February 03, 2003 at 18:56:02, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On February 03, 2003 at 18:30:37, John Merlino wrote: >> >>>On February 03, 2003 at 17:58:34, Matthew Hull wrote: >>> >>>>On February 03, 2003 at 17:45:13, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >>>> >>>>>1) He's got money problems - there's a bank asking for his money after his site >>>>>has been closed. >>>>> >>>>>2) He's older now, and can't calculate as accurate as he did ten years ago. At >>>>>the age of Kortchnoi, he would probably be demented or dead. >>>>> >>>>>3) He lost his beloved World Champion Title, and he's not as strong as Botwinnik >>>>>to fight back his title. >>>>> >>>>>4) He loves money, but he is much cheaper than Fischer. Fischer would not fight >>>>>against a computer for less than US$5,000,000. >>>>> >>>>>5) He doesn't have any character at all. He admits to be kicked by a Pepsi >>>>>machine if you pay him. >>>>> >>>>>6) He was defeated by a multi-processor computer once. Probably he's got a >>>>>"post-traumatic disorder" since that defeat. >>>>> >>>>>7) He's capable of anything just to defend his intentions. Remember that "PCA" >>>>>organization? >>>>> >>>>>Come on guys, this guy is a joke, and a bad, bad one... >>>>> >>>>>A. Ponti >>>> >>>> >>>>I'm not sure another GM is the answer. Progs are pretty strong now. Kramnik >>>>could not dominate DF. Hiarcs is drawn with that other GM. GM Guseinov drew >>>>two slow games with Crafty. Professor Hyatt says there are no GMs on ICC that >>>>are able to dominate Crafty. It looks to me like parity has been achieved. >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>>Matt >>> >>>Don't forget Chessmaster 9000's victory in a 4-game match against GM >>>Christiansen with a single CPU system. >>> >>>jm >> >>Human chess or anti-comp? >> >>Rolf Tueschen > >You have to give a lot of credit to Larry. He played all-out wild tactical chess >(which is his style, so you could definitely say he was playing "human chess"). >Except for the first game (which was the only one CM lost) they were all very >exciting. > >If you are an ICC member, just "fi CM9000" to see how you can view the games. Or >you can just download them from www.chessmaster.com (although I'm not sure >exactly where they are stored anymore). I was just a guest (without registering) on ICC and had no access so far to the bases. Since I do not play myself, in special Bullet, I see no reason to pay for being a spectator. They should really give such a category. Not playing just having fun while watching. They might also inhibit that such watchers comment. Is there such a variation? As to the match, you see what the difference is how the players behave. Of course normal chess is premature against comps. And Blitz is premature and pompousness in combination. Makes no sense although many seem to like it. Rolf Tueschen > >jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.