Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 07:47:03 02/05/03
I waited with interest for these comments, but after I read them I am disappointed. I see no ANALYSIS! What I see is music meant to accompany the promotion event. 1) Shipov. He is the only one who puts his finger into the hell of wounds of that game. He is the only one who tells the truth. But he does it so silently that only real experts or chess experts get it. He simply states after a dozen moves of impossibilities, that"now d5 and in the long run the two weaknesses h3 and f3 will show up", something like that. Of course, every young player in a training lesson who would miss either b5 or d5 would get angry reactions. Funny that the two other commentators didn't see a possibility for b5/d5 at all. 2) Amir. Of course he is in love with his baby. And I don't want to put the blame on him. But his comment here in CCC is simply fairy tale. He gives b5 only in a situation when DJ could sac a piece. I didn't look at this but if b5 is good that would also prove that Kasparov, who normally is good for such complications, helped the computer not to lose. Amir NEVER speaks of d5. Clear, how could he know? 3) Garry himself. I never saw a worse commentary. He did such a deep work on even historic games, and here in a case of his own game he is almost speakless. Where is b5 or d5??? Ok, Kasparov gives two or three moves with better prospects, but he does not say why he didn't play it. He even praises h3!!! In that particular situation. Omigod. Apparently the organizers have not invited experts who give independant opinions! No Pachman. No Byrne. Where can I read exact analyses by GM Seirawan or Ashley who are again authorized to give live comments on the stage? Where is the objective verdict about the 4th game? Unbelievable. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.