Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:33:49 02/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2003 at 10:47:03, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >I waited with interest for these comments, but after I read them I am >disappointed. I see no ANALYSIS! What I see is music meant to accompany the >promotion event. > >1) Shipov. He is the only one who puts his finger into the hell of wounds of >that game. He is the only one who tells the truth. But he does it so silently >that only real experts or chess experts get it. He simply states after a dozen >moves of impossibilities, that"now d5 and in the long run the two weaknesses h3 >and f3 will show up", something like that. Of course, every young player in a >training lesson who would miss either b5 or d5 would get angry reactions. Funny >that the two other commentators didn't see a possibility for b5/d5 at all. I do not think that black could get the advantage by d5. After 16...d5 17.f4 I do not see that black has the advantage. It is not clear if 17...b5 or 18...b5 leads to an advantage for black. Kasparov also commented about 18...b5 and he did not play it not because of the piece sacrifice but because of other reasons. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.