Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 14:43:56 02/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2003 at 17:39:33, Russell Reagan wrote: >On February 05, 2003 at 17:27:27, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>I dont think DJ knows that he is playing against Kasparov :) >>The sacrifice will be proven to be dubious. > >That has nothing to do with anything. > >There is a huge difference between theoretical dubiousness (of which you speak) >and practical dubiousness. Maybe in 10,000 years a computer will solve chess, >and we will be able to say, "1. e4 is a dubious move", and in 10,000 years, we >may be able to look at this game and say, "that was a dubious sacrifice". That >is theoretical dubiousness, and doesn't matter one bit here. 1.e4 will certainly never proven to be dubious.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.