Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: It was really a win for Kasparov.

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 16:30:09 02/05/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 05, 2003 at 19:05:42, Terry McCracken wrote:

>On February 05, 2003 at 18:51:49, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>On February 05, 2003 at 18:38:36, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>
>>>On February 05, 2003 at 18:11:24, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote:
>>>
>>>>Date: 5 /2/2003
>>>>White: Kasparov
>>>>Black: Deep Junior
>>>>
>>>>Mate in 51
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>1. g3 Qh5 2. Rh1 Nxe3+ 3. Rxh5 Bg4+ 4. Kf2 Nxc2 5. Rah1
>>>>( 5. Bxh7+ Kf8 6. Bxc2 Bxh5 7. Rh1 Bxe2 8. Nxe2 a5 9. g4 Nd7 10. Ng3 g6 11. f5
>>>>Kg7 12. Bh6+ Kh7 13. fxg6+ fxg6 14. Bg5+ Kg7 15. Rh6 Nf8 16. Ne2 Re6 17. Nf4 Rd6
>>>>18. Nh5+ Kf7 19. Bh4 Re8 20. Nf4 b6 21. Bg3 c5 22. g5 cxd4 23. Ne2 Rc6 24. Bd3
>>>>Kg7 25. Nxd4 Rc1 26. Bxg6 Nxg6 27. Nf5+ Kf8 28. Rxg6 Rc2+ 29. Kf3 Rxb2 30. Rf6+
>>>>Kg8 31. g6 Rb1 32. Rf7 Rh1 33. Ne7+ Rxe7 34. Rxe7 Rf1+ 35. Bf2 Kf8 36. Rd7 Rd1
>>>>37. Ke2 Rc1 38. Bd4 Rc8 39. Bf6 b5 40. Rh7 Ke8 41. Rh8+ Kd7 42. Rxc8 Kxc8 43. g7
>>>>Kd7 44. g8Q Kd6 45. Qd8+ Ke6 46. Qe7+ Kf5 47. Qf7 d4 48. Kf3 d3 49. Bd4+ Kg5 50.
>>>>Be3+ Kh4 51. Qh7#)
>>>>
>>>>1-0
>>>
>>>Unfortunately it is not so simple:
>>>
>>>[Event "ICS Unrated Standard match"]
>>>[Site "chessclub.com"]
>>>[Date "2002.07.29"]
>>>[Round "?"]
>>>[White "*Kasparov(GM)"]
>>>[Black "*Deep_Junior(C)"]
>>>[Result "*"]
>>>[ECO "E48"]
>>>[Annotator ""]
>>>[PlyCount "36"]
>>>[EventDate "2002.??.??"]
>>>[TimeControl "7200"]
>>>
>>>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 O-O 5. Bd3 d5 6. cxd5 exd5 7. Nge2 Re8 8.
>>>O-O Bd6 9. a3 c6 10. Qc2 Bxh2+ 11. Kxh2 Ng4+ 12. Kg3 Qg5 13. f4 Qh5 14. Bd2
>>>Qh2+ 15. Kf3 Qh4 16. g3 Nh2+ 17. Kf2 Ng4+ 18. Ke1 (18. Kg2 Qh2+ 19. Kf3 g6 $1
>>>20. f5 Nd7 21. e4 dxe4+ 22. Bxe4 (22. Nxe4 gxf5) 22... Ndf6 23. fxg6 fxg6 24.
>>>Rae1 Rf8 25. Nf4 g5 26. Re2 Qh6) 18... Qh3 *
>>>
>>>seems to be the critical variation.
>>>maybe now 19.Rg1 Sd7 20.Kd1. Anyway, if Kasparov really wanted to win this match
>>>he had to go for it. IMO it is even better to lose than to accept a draw.
>>>Not for the purse but for his reputation.
>>
>>
>>Ay, ay!
>>
>>Rolf Tueschen
>>
>>P.S.
>>
>>But note that already a3 was the prep of the hoax.
>
>You don't mind if I quote you on that outside this forum?


For 2 US $$ you are allowed to quote me. I already had the idea of Bxh2 after
a3. But then came c6 "out of book" already, but Fritz book had still 3 (!!)
continuations. Best c5. So I said Bh2 on the Fritzserver in Germany. But then
after c6 when DJ took his time for his next move I was sure that he would play
Bxh2 and he did. You can quote me that I am sure that Kasp knew that from his
preppies. But he's really a good act. Perhaps new Tarzan!

Ta-da.

Rolf Tueschen



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.