Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: some analysis by Movei after g3 Nh2+ Kf2 Ng4+

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 05:07:30 02/06/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 06, 2003 at 07:49:09, Drexel,Michael wrote:

>On February 06, 2003 at 07:34:27, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>
>>On February 06, 2003 at 06:49:48, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>>
>>>On February 06, 2003 at 05:36:53, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 06, 2003 at 05:22:44, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On February 06, 2003 at 04:19:11, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Movei always like Ke1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Here is the main line at depth 16(p850)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>depth=16 +1.77 f2e1 h4h3 c3d1 g4h2 d3h7 g8h8 f1f2 h3h5 h7d3 h2f3 f2f3 h5f3
>>>>d1f2
>>>>>>b8d7 a1c1 d7f6 c2b3 h8g8 b3b4
>>>>>
>>>>>that mainline sucks it just shuffles pieces with black instead of developing.
>>>>>
>>>>>h4h3?? what a stupid move. why not Qh2 and then h5 nbd7 and develop with black.
>>>>>white cannot do a thing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Take a quick look at:
>>>>http://www.worldchessrating.com/522252335.html?805921192746609
>>>>GM Shipov is K buddy but not stupid.
>>>
>>>Shipov gives 19 Nd1 after g3 in his analysis. I gave this Nd1 on the
>>>Fritzserveri Mendi's game show. What makes me nervous is this: ifplayers of my
>>>"class" can see such moves/ideas, Kasparov has a much better qualification. To
>>>assume that such a situation might be too difficult against a machine (what
>>>Shipov is telling) is crazy. Just take a look at the almost super-human
>>>complications in some of Kasparov's games! If not Kasparov, who else could show
>>>us how a human could crush a comp. Isn't he paid enough high??? That is why I am
>>>so upset. The performance is simply disgusting compared to that money he got.
>>>Period.
>>>
>>>Rolf Tueschen
>>>
>>
>>You are probably right here. According to Mig Kasparov worried about
>>16...Qh2. After 16...Qh2 17.Rae1 there seems to be nothing to worry about. I
>>havent analysed this position as deep as I should but a chessfriend of mine told
>>me that DJ7 gives half a pawn advantage for white and would play 17...g6. Im
>>pretty sure that white is able to defend after g6 and can convert his material
>>advantage.
>>17.Bxh7+ is also possible and slightly better for white.
>>No reason to make a draw.
>>Dont forget: Others get much more money they didnt deserve.
>
>note that 17.Rae1 Nxe3 18.Bxe3 Bg4+ 19.Kxg4 Rxe3 can be answered with 20.Bxh7+.
>if not 17...Nxe3 white can play Nd1 next.

Thanks. Please do also note that the others don't talk about mankind and such.
Then it begins to become odd. And also: in other fields the journalists are not
such cowards. Here they are so corrupt and let aside all critic and worship when
the mere gamescores tell a different story.

Rolf Tueschen


>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>it just shuffles. another few ply won't help you here.
>>>>>>>>>Time: 01:24:53.90
>>>>>>Nodes: 668139400 NPS: 131164
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I will give it some hours to analyze.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.