Author: Chris Carson
Date: 05:20:20 02/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2003 at 21:01:40, Michael Vox wrote: >I wonder if Hyattian theory has any insight into this matter ? I am a big fan of Dr. Hyatt. He has done more for this profession than I ever will/could. He had an opinion and he stated it and made valid arguments for it. Nothing wrong with that. Eventually processor speed and human ingenuity (sp?) by the programmers have provided us with Super GM strength/performance program/HW. However, the programs are not perfect and there is still plenty of improvements to be made, Dr. Hyatt will continue to be a leading inventor in that area and perhaps others. I for one would like to read a "History of Computer Chess" and/or "Future of Thinking Machines" book if he would author or co-author it. I for one enjoy reading his posts, thank him for Crafty, admire hime for his scientific/technical contributions, wish him the best and I am thankful he has volunteered to be a moderator for the forum. Thanks Dr. Hyatt. Best Regars, Chris Carson "If we always agree, why do we need the discussion?" - Not sure of the author. Just my 2 cents.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.