Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 06:04:15 02/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2003 at 08:36:23, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On February 06, 2003 at 08:22:32, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On February 06, 2003 at 08:11:47, Dan Andersson wrote: >> >>>I just wanted to add something to your variations: >>>17. Rae1 g6 18. Nd1 Qh5! 19. Rh1 Nxe3+ 20. Rxh5 Bg4+ 21. Kf2 Nxc2 22. Re5 Rxe5 >>>And black seems OK. You are constantly overestimating the ease of whites play in >>>your analysis. Not that I'm saying that black is winning. But it is much harder >>>for white than you seem to think, judging from your posted variations. >>> >>>MvH Dan Andersson >> >>If you believe it or not. I have looked at this line before and consider it to >>be better for white. white should be safe and could play for a win. ideas like >>f5 come to mind and the bishop pair is strong. >>I dont think I overestimate the ease of whites play and I would surely make >>mistakes if I had to play this position over the board but we are talking about >>Kasparov here. >> >>btw, there is another interesting line after 17...h5 white should play 18.e4 and >>in my short analysis whites King always managed to escape with advantage. > >Shredder 7 likes 22.Bxc2 not 22.Re5 and here the idea f5 is interesting. >forgot to mention that. Sorry Unfortunately Shredder is wrong, the whole line looks more like a draw. Anyway, to come to an end: I vote for 17.Bxh7+ Qxh7 18.Qxh7+ Kxh7 19.Rh1+ followed by Rh4 and Rah1, Sc1,d3 and so on. its not much, however Qeens are off and human should do better. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.