Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: There Is A 1/5 Chance That DJ 2003 Is As Good As DB '97. Amir Was Wrong!

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 07:51:43 02/06/03

Go up one level in this thread

On February 06, 2003 at 10:45:20, Graham Laight wrote:

>On February 06, 2003 at 10:27:36, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>I believe that Amir did not say that PCs of 1997 were as strong as DB.
>>
>>Uri
>
>Have you not seen the large number of posts from him INSISTING that DB was
>over-rated, and either implying or stating outright that PCs could have done as
>well, if not better?
>
>n.b. may need to go back a couple of years to find these threads against Robert
>Hyatt.
>
>-g

We are talking about computers of the beginning of 1997 with hardware of 1997.

I believe that he talked about it near 2000 when hardware and software were
clearly better.

Uri

• Re: There Is A 1/5 Chance That DJ 2003 Is As Good As DB '97. Amir Was Wrong! Chris Carson 08:36:29 02/06/03
• Re: There Is A 1/5 Chance That DJ 2003 Is As Good As DB '97. Amir Was Wrong! Graham Laight 08:22:28 02/06/03
  • Re: There Is A 1/5 Chance That DJ 2003 Is As Good As DB '97. Amir Was Wrong! Uri Blass 08:27:48 02/06/03
    • Re: There Is A 1/5 Chance That DJ 2003 Is As Good As DB '97. Amir Was Wrong! Drexel,Michael 08:54:10 02/06/03
      • Re: There Is A 1/5 Chance That DJ 2003 Is As Good As DB '97. Amir Was Wrong! Uri Blass 09:01:35 02/06/03
        • Re: There Is A 1/5 Chance That DJ 2003 Is As Good As DB '97. Amir Was Wrong! Drexel,Michael 09:14:47 02/06/03
          • Re: There Is A 1/5 Chance That DJ 2003 Is As Good As DB '97. Amir Was Wrong! Uri Blass 09:20:12 02/06/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.