Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 08:25:51 02/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2003 at 07:54:59, Manfred Meiler wrote: >On February 06, 2003 at 07:34:31, Christophe Drieu wrote: > >>PIII 1ghz hash=48Mo >> >>[D]rnbqr1k1/pp3ppp/2pb1n2/3p4/3P4/P1NBP3/1PQ1NPPP/R1B2RK1 b - - 0 1 >> >>00:00:00.1 0,06 1 3 Qc7 >>00:00:00.1 0,16 1 144 Qc7 >>00:00:00.1 0,46 2 284 Qc7 Nf4 >>00:00:00.1 0,24 3 1539 Qc7 Nf4 Bg4 >>00:00:00.1 0,32 4 2942 Qc7 Nf4 g5 Nh3 Bxh2+ Kh1 Bxh3 gxh3 >>00:00:00.2 0,12 5 18092 Qc7 Ng3 Be6 b4 Nbd7 >>00:00:00.3 0,18 6 38719 Qc7 Ng3 Be6 b4 a5 bxa5 Rxa5 >>00:00:00.5 0,06 7 75313 Qc7 Ng3 Bg4 b4 a5 b5 Nbd7 bxc6 bxc6 >>00:00:00.6 0,16 7 105367 Ng4 Bxh7+ Kh8 h3 Qh4 Bd3 Qh6 >>00:00:01.1 0,24 8 199436 Ng4 Ng3 Qh4 h3 Nxe3 Bxe3 Rxe3 fxe3 Bxg3 >>00:00:02.4 0,26 9 458020 Ng4 Ng3 Qh4 h3 Nf6 Nf5 Bxf5 Bxf5 g6 g3 >>00:00:05.7 0,12 10 1144210 Ng4 Ng3 Qh4 h3 Nf6 Nf5 Bxf5 Bxf5 g6 Bd3 Ng4 >>00:00:09.7 0,52 10 2031695 Bxh2+ Kxh2 Ng4+ Kg3 Qg5 Bxh7+ Kf8 f4 Qh5 Nxd5 Qxd5 >>Qc5+ Qxc5 >>00:00:11.7 0,50 11 2493035 Bxh2+ Kxh2 Ng4+ Kg3 Qg5 Bxh7+ Kf8 f4 Qh5 Bd3 g5 fxg5 >>Qxg5 >>00:00:16.9 0,54 12 3673184 Bxh2+ Kxh2 Ng4+ Kg3 Qg5 Bxh7+ Kf8 f4 Qh5 Bd3 g6 Nd1 >>Qh2+ Kf3 Bf5 >>00:00:35.1 0,52 13 8037854 Bxh2+ Kxh2 Ng4+ Kg3 Qg5 f4 Qh5 Ng1 Re6 Nf3 Rh6 b3 >>00:01:59.6 0,08 14 28075330 Bxh2+ Kxh2 Ng4+ Kg3 Qg5 f4 Qh5 Ng1 f6 f5 g6 fxg6 >>hxg6 > > >Also Gambit Tiger 2.0 aggressive (CB) on PIII-800 hash 48mb finds Bh2+ at depth >10 - but changed to Qc7 after 20 minutes at depth 15: >... >10...Ng4 11.Ng3 Qh4 12.h3 Nf6 13.Nf5 Bxf5 14.Bxf5 g6 15.Bd3 Ng4 16.Nxd5 cxd5 >17.hxg4 Qxg4 > = (-0.04) Depth: 10 00:00:12 1535kN >10...Qc7 11.Ng3 Nbd7 12.Bd2 Nf8 13.b4 Ng4 14.Nce2 Ng6 15.h3 > = (-0.10) Depth: 10 00:00:13 1701kN >10...Bxh2+ 11.Kxh2 Ng4+ 12.Kg3 Qg5 13.Bxh7+ Kf8 14.f4 Qh5 15.Nxd5 Qxd5 16.Qc5+ >Qxc5 17.dxc5 Nxe3 18.Bxe3 > ³ (-0.52) Depth: 10 00:00:20 3100kN >10...Bxh2+ 11.Kxh2 Ng4+ 12.Kg3 Qg5 13.Bxh7+ Kf8 14.f4 Qh5 15.Bd3 Qh2+ 16.Kf3 Qh4 >17.Ng3 Be6 > ³ (-0.30) Depth: 11 00:00:22 3396kN >10...Bxh2+ 11.Kxh2 Ng4+ 12.Kg3 Qg5 13.Bxh7+ Kf8 14.f4 Qh5 15.Bd3 g5 16.fxg5 Qh2+ >17.Kf3 Qh4 18.Nf4 Qxg5 > ³ (-0.34) Depth: 12 00:00:31 4728kN >10...Bxh2+ 11.Kxh2 Ng4+ 12.Kg3 Qg5 13.f4 Qh5 14.Bd2 f5 15.Rh1 Qg6 16.Kf3 Be6 >17.Rh3 Nd7 > ³ (-0.28) Depth: 13 00:01:17 13193kN >10...Bxh2+ 11.Kxh2 Ng4+ 12.Kg3 Qg5 13.f4 Qh5 14.Bd2 f5 15.Ng1 a5 16.Nf3 Nxe3 >17.Bxe3 Rxe3 > ³ (-0.38) Depth: 14 00:02:48 29814kN >10..Bxh2+ 11.Kxh2 Ng4+ 12.Kg3 Qg5 13.f4 Qh5 14.f5 g5 15.Ng1 f6 16.Nf3 Re7 >17.Nxd5 Rg7 18.b3 Nd7 > = (0.10) Depth: 15 00:15:57 189812kN >10...Qc7 11.Ng3 Nd7 12.Bd2 Nb6 13.Ne2 Bg4 14.Bb4 Bxb4 15.axb4 Qd6 16.Nf5 Bxf5 >17.Bxf5 Re7 18.b5 cb5 > = (0.00) Depth: 15 00:20:10 229599kN I guess, it's no big deal from a comp's point of view. Either is a draw (or a very close to draw) line; so it's a bit pure chance what's gonna be played. Comet prefers Qc7 from the beginning and "thinks", it's a draw. Uli
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.