Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 06:07:16 02/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2003 at 08:33:30, Eran wrote: >The deep position analysis gave more accurate information about the game 6 but >did not guarantee that Black would win. The results showed that Black was a >little better than White. Despite of Kasparov's fear to lose the game 6 >yesterday, he had a good chance to win. Besides, in that position Black only had >two pawns in the center files - e and d files - and Black had a good chance to >promote them soon. Kasparov gave up his chance to win too early and that was >pitiful. I would not bother complaining, the majority view here seems to be that the result was fine. As for myself, I think both sides were pathetic, one only has to look at the game to see there was plenty left in it. The whole point of these man vs machine games is to see whether the man can defeat the machine who is never mentally tired. The game was only starting. Either side could have made a mistake, probably Kasparov would have been the one too. Maybe what they need is to make the machine not accept draws so easily. Both sides had lost 1 pawn and their queens. No pieces developed to attack. everything was just getting interesting. And they quit like pathetic cowards. If this is an example of high quality chess then both Kasparov and the DJ team can go get fucked. Niether of them deserve anything from this result. Maybe if we all swap queens early an lose a pawn here and there we can have plenty of great draws from now on. I put this position into chessmaster and chessmaster would not accept a draw from this position. Maybe because chessmaster does not have controllers who are wimps and cowards. This final game really pisses me off.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.