Author: Earl Fuller
Date: 09:54:18 02/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2003 at 12:21:09, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 08, 2003 at 11:02:07, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: > >>Earl, >> >>It was a win for black but Kasparov, Amir Ban and Shay Bushinski are all good >>friends. This was not a title match. Deep Junior does not have the knowledge to >>beat a grandmaster. In ten years that may be different. >> >>It is possible to agree to a draw even if you are winning. I have done it many >>times. Friendship is more valuable than winning. >> >>TJF > >It was not a clear win for black and people even posted games when white won >in comp-comp games. > >Uri Yes Uri, this is true and i think this debate will go on for some time. Perhaps, with perfect play on both sides, Hmmmmm, well i don't think either machine nor man plays a perfect game. The closes we humans come to perfection in this game is Mr. Kasparov (Fisher) and for computers we have Fritz, Shredder, Deep Junior, Genius, etc. and many other top programs. But, the time is coming when the best man will ever be able to do is draw! Even if the program still doesn't play perfect chess, Hmmmmm, interesting! Of course, how would we know if the program isn't playing a perfect game, if all we could do is draw or loose? yadda-yadda-yadda, lololol
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.