Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:43:05 02/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2003 at 15:25:45, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 08, 2003 at 15:17:14, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On February 08, 2003 at 12:21:09, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 08, 2003 at 11:02:07, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >>> >>>>Earl, >>>> >>>>It was a win for black but Kasparov, Amir Ban and Shay Bushinski are all good >>>>friends. This was not a title match. Deep Junior does not have the knowledge to >>>>beat a grandmaster. In ten years that may be different. >>>> >>>>It is possible to agree to a draw even if you are winning. I have done it many >>>>times. Friendship is more valuable than winning. >>>> >>>>TJF >>> >>>It was not a clear win for black and people even posted games when white won >>>in comp-comp games. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >> >>Hehe, what does it prove if Black was a comp?? >> >>Rolf Tueschen > >It only proves that there is no evidence for the claim that black was winning. Oh NO! Not at all! You are dead wrong. Just because two stupid progs couldn't play for a win, it's not proven that K couldn't do that. In fact he could. And he would. But his plans were different. Only do you NOT pretend here that he couldn't because progs couldn't, please. >A clear win is somethings that I expect top programs to demonstrate in a game. Not at all. Deep Junior for sure has NOT the class to hold such a position positionally. > >The position was not clear and instead of trying to solve the problem by playing >the sides agree to a draw too early(I criticize both sides) > >I think that this behaviour will not encourage chess players to watch the next >match and it can reduce the chances that sponsors will pay for another >human-computer match. Here I agree with you. Rolf Tueschen > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.