Author: Mike Hood
Date: 18:25:36 02/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2003 at 21:00:53, Mike Hood wrote: >Today I set up a position to compare the EGTB probing efficiency of several >Chessbase engines. My PC is a Pentium III 733 MHz and I have all the 3/4/5-piece >EGTBs. For the tests I gave the engines 128 MB hash tables. The position is: > >[D] 8/6k1/6P1/p4K2/8/8/4P1P1/8 w - - 0 1 > >The optimal win is Mate in 25 with minor variations in the moves, for instance > >1. Ke5 a4 2. Kd4 a3 3. Kc3 a2 4. Kb2 a1Q+ 5. Kxa1 >(Here it enters the KPP-KP EGTB) On checking my post, I made an error here... it's actually the KPPP-K EGTB. Maybe some of the inconsistencies are caused by certain engines not implementing the code for probing Kxxx-K tablebases? <--snip-->
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.