Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Scandal is the immediate draw after sac of RxN!

Author: Michael Cummings

Date: 01:17:20 02/09/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 09, 2003 at 03:57:29, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>On February 09, 2003 at 03:49:28, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>On February 08, 2003 at 23:26:05, Michael Cummings wrote:
>>
>>>To clarify, if you saw two GM's or any players for that matter at the same
>>>position as Kasparov and DJ were at. How many would have agree'd to a draw?
>>>
>>>I have been looking through my database of chess games for draws, and I have yet
>>>been able to find one that agreed to a draw being 1 pawn and a queen each down.
>>>
>>>Maybe someone else can find a game in which this has happened. drawing a game
>>>with 98% of the pieces still in play?
>>
>>??
>>
>>Do you actually play chess?
>>
>>bruce
>
>
>I appreciate his reflection but he put it into a wrong question. And all others
>followed him on that road - to my big surprise - as if they all had no
>understanding of chess.
>
>The end of the 6th is not sensational because of the quantity of material left
>or the number of moves being played.
>
>The scandal is this:
>
>There is no example IMO in human chess where a player - in that early stage -
>sacrificed the "quality" (R against N or B) JUST to offer a draw!
>
>Rolf Tueschen

Yes that is what I meant. I thought I did say it that way, oh well



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.