Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 01:54:52 02/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2003 at 04:20:12, Michael Cummings wrote: >On February 09, 2003 at 03:49:28, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On February 08, 2003 at 23:26:05, Michael Cummings wrote: >> >>>To clarify, if you saw two GM's or any players for that matter at the same >>>position as Kasparov and DJ were at. How many would have agree'd to a draw? >>> >>>I have been looking through my database of chess games for draws, and I have yet >>>been able to find one that agreed to a draw being 1 pawn and a queen each down. >>> >>>Maybe someone else can find a game in which this has happened. drawing a game >>>with 98% of the pieces still in play? >> >>?? >> >>Do you actually play chess? >> >>bruce > > >First Rolf actuyally seemed to clarify what I was trying to say, and second, I >seem to one of the few who actually do play a game of chess and do not agree to >draws after the first move. > >That makes me a better player than you Bruce. When do you offer a draw ?? when >you lose you first pawn, or maybe a bishop and knight also ??? ROTFL! You don't even understand Bruce's point, as you are talking about Game 6 and _any_ chessplayer with a bit of knowledge, knows Black stands better after Rxc3! It's a bloody thematic move, for crying out loud! Kasparov really could have pushed for the win, but opted for the draw, as he wanted to quit in a better position, showing I can outplay this thing, but why take a risk of a blunder against a computer after 80 moves in which it would take to win with Black! Boy you're dense! I'm sure Bruce would mop the "board" with you!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.