Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 02:26:19 02/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2003 at 04:17:20, Michael Cummings wrote: >On February 09, 2003 at 03:57:29, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On February 09, 2003 at 03:49:28, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On February 08, 2003 at 23:26:05, Michael Cummings wrote: >>> >>>>To clarify, if you saw two GM's or any players for that matter at the same >>>>position as Kasparov and DJ were at. How many would have agree'd to a draw? >>>> >>>>I have been looking through my database of chess games for draws, and I have yet >>>>been able to find one that agreed to a draw being 1 pawn and a queen each down. >>>> >>>>Maybe someone else can find a game in which this has happened. drawing a game >>>>with 98% of the pieces still in play? >>> >>>?? >>> >>>Do you actually play chess? >>> >>>bruce >> >> >>I appreciate his reflection but he put it into a wrong question. And all others >>followed him on that road - to my big surprise - as if they all had no >>understanding of chess. >> >>The end of the 6th is not sensational because of the quantity of material left >>or the number of moves being played. >> >>The scandal is this: >> >>There is no example IMO in human chess where a player - in that early stage - >>sacrificed the "quality" (R against N or B) JUST to offer a draw! >> >>Rolf Tueschen > >Yes that is what I meant. I thought I did say it that way, oh well I understood you but others read only a queen and 1 pawn exchanged yet and fantasized a different question. Thanks for the good input. So we could see how communication goes. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.