Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:37:27 02/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2003 at 04:59:45, Terry McCracken wrote: >On February 09, 2003 at 04:17:20, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On February 09, 2003 at 03:57:29, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On February 09, 2003 at 03:49:28, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>> >>>>On February 08, 2003 at 23:26:05, Michael Cummings wrote: >>>> >>>>>To clarify, if you saw two GM's or any players for that matter at the same >>>>>position as Kasparov and DJ were at. How many would have agree'd to a draw? >>>>> >>>>>I have been looking through my database of chess games for draws, and I have yet >>>>>been able to find one that agreed to a draw being 1 pawn and a queen each down. >>>>> >>>>>Maybe someone else can find a game in which this has happened. drawing a game >>>>>with 98% of the pieces still in play? >>>> >>>>?? >>>> >>>>Do you actually play chess? >>>> >>>>bruce >>> >>> >>>I appreciate his reflection but he put it into a wrong question. And all others >>>followed him on that road - to my big surprise - as if they all had no >>>understanding of chess. >>> >>>The end of the 6th is not sensational because of the quantity of material left >>>or the number of moves being played. >>> >>>The scandal is this: >>> >>>There is no example IMO in human chess where a player - in that early stage - >>>sacrificed the "quality" (R against N or B) JUST to offer a draw! >>> >>>Rolf Tueschen >> >>Yes that is what I meant. I thought I did say it that way, oh well > >Then niether of you or Rolf _actually_ play chess! > >You guys suck! Patzers! Ha! Wrong logic. Sacrificing quality and offering a draw later is not something common so ignorance about cases that it happens is not a proof that the player does not play chess. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.