Author: stuart taylor
Date: 03:56:18 02/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2003 at 23:21:29, Michael Cummings wrote: >On February 08, 2003 at 20:50:54, stuart taylor wrote: > >>E.g. Smirin and another who has best chance against machine should play, perhaps >>3 vs DF and 3 vs DJ each, then, if no one gets much improvement on Kasparov and >>Kramniks results, then we will know that the competition is over, and that man >>does not dominate machine in chess. >>S.Taylor > >What happens if we get dished up the same type of pathetic draws like we did >this time. > >The path will now goto not trying to win, but not to lose and to try and get an >early draw to cut your chances of losing. That will also be a slight challenge for computers, not to sucumb to easy draws. Kasparov, however, didn't seem to need to go too crazy just for draws. I don't know if you can call these "pathetic" draws. That's only how it looks afterwards to us. Maybe only the last draw was pathetic. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.