Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 06:25:43 02/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2003 at 20:03:21, John Merlino wrote:
>>>
>>I can't see why it is a blunder, but PostModernist agrees.
>
>The only thing I can see in common between these two positions is that, in both
>of them, White is forced to make a move that loses material. In the first
>position, it's 36.Rf3. In the second, it's 41.Rxf4. I would doubt that Chezzz
>has a specific problem with this, but I would need to see the PV for 32...Qa2 to
>verify this theory.
After 32... Qa2:
time nodes depth score pv
00:00:00.00 18n 01/01/03 -1.286 33. Ra1 (18)
00:00:00.02 40n 01/01/03 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:00.02 104n 02/02/03 -1.286 33. Ra1 Qb2 (104)
00:00:00.04 256n 02/02/04 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:00.04 581n 03/04/06 -1.286 33. Ra1 Qb2 34. Rb1 (581)
00:00:00.05 915n 03/04/07 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:00.05 2330n 04/09/10 -1.286 33. Ra1 Qb2 34. Rb1 Qa2 (2330)
00:00:00.07 3040n 04/09/10 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:00.08 8600n 05/11/12 -1.024 33. Ra1 Qe6 34. Rc1 Rhc8
35. Rxc2 Rxc2 (8600)
00:00:00.10 10kn 05/11/12 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:00.13 25kn 06/12/13 -1.293 33. Ra1 Qe6 34. Kh2 Rhc8
35. h4 f6 (25685)
00:00:00.16 32kn 06/13/14 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:00.21 59kn 07/13/14 -1.293 33. Ra1 Qe6 34. Kh2 Rhc8
35. h4 f6 36. Rb1 (59509)
00:00:00.25 78kn 07/14/15 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:00.50 232kn 08/15/16 -1.578 33. Ra1 Qb2 34. Rb1 Qc3
35. Kh2 Rd2 36. Rc1 Qxb4 (232600)
00:00:00.64 315kn 08/16/17 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:00.88 458kn 09/18/19 -1.573 33. Ra1 Qb2 34. Rb1 Qc3
35. Kh2 Rd2 36. Qe1 Qc2
37. Qg3 Rxd3 (458958)
00:00:01.10 592kn 09/18/19 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:01.80 1025kn 10/20/22 -1.648 33. Ra1 Qb2 34. Rb1 Qa3
35. Kh2 Qc3 36. Kg3 Rd2
37. Qe1 Rxd3+ 38. Kh2 (1025940)
00:00:02.08 1172kn 10/20/22 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:03.25 1900kn 11/23/26 -1.570 33. Ra1 Qb2 34. Rb1 Qa3
35. Rg1 Rc3 36. Rf1 Rxd3
37. Ra1 Rxd1 38. Rxa3 Rxf1+
39. Bxf1 (1900438)
00:00:04.18 2466kn 11/23/26 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:06.24 3755kn 12/24/26 -1.698 33. Ra1 Qb2 34. Rb1 Qa3
35. Kh2 Rhc8 36. h4 R8c3
37. Qe1 Rxd3 38. Rf2 Rdc3
39. Rxc2 Rxc2 (3755119)
00:00:07.24 4356kn 12/24/26 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:11.75 7251kn 13/26/27 -1.745 33. Ra1 Qb2 34. Rb1 Qa3
35. Rc1 Rhc8 36. Rxc2 Rxc2
37. Qb1 Qc3 38. Qe1 Qb2 (7251932)
00:00:14.22 8768kn 13/26/29 ---------------------------------------------------
00:00:21.21 13Mn 14/29/30 -1.920 33. Ra1 Qb2 34. Rb1 Rxg2
35. Rxb2 Rxb2 36. Rf3 Nxf3
37. Qxf3 Rxb4 38. g5 Rb1+
39. Kg2 Rb2+ 40. Kg3 Rc2 (13235836)
00:00:26.94 16Mn 14/30/31 ---------------------------------------------------
>
>I did notice that, in the second position, Chezzz likes 39...Nc2, which only
>wins the b4 pawn, instead of 39...Ne2 with wins the exchange as mentioned above.
>
Yeah, I will have to look into this...
>That's all this patzer is able to see with CM9000 and a slow machine....
>
>sorry.... :-)
>
>jm
Thanks!
/David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.