Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 12:59:12 02/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2003 at 13:10:03, Russell Reagan wrote: >On February 09, 2003 at 12:54:19, Dana Turnmire wrote: > >>The only thing that puzzles me is why someone like Edward Nemeth can defeat >>these programs but a top grandmaster has such a hard time. Why would Kasparov >>or any other grandmaster not use anti-computer play in such a match? > >That is because Eduard only shows you his wins. He may have lost 100 games for >each win he gets. Kasparov or Kramnik could do the same, and just publish their >wins. But it doesn't mean much, unless it was a live exhibition, and the human >pummeled the computer as Eduard does in like 8 out of 10 blitz games. I call the mpoderation here for that character assassination! Eduard Nemeth has always corrected those who claimed that. He simply doesn't do it. To verify his actual standpoint I asked him after the 6th and he again confirmed me that he did NOT train or select his wins (against a pool of losses). Please take back that insult and apologize! "I wake up, suddenly I have an idea, then I play a game and then post it." That is what happensin his own words, in my quote by heart. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.