Author: Graham Laight
Date: 01:28:48 02/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2003 at 19:39:29, Uri Blass wrote: >I do not see something wrong in using another machine to analyze >during the game. > >The important thing is that one machine does the moves when the operators cannot >change it's moves. > >The decision if to accept draw or offer draw is not machine decision by the >rules so in this case I do not see it as important if it is done by one operator >or by some humans and machines. This is wrong. It is supposed to be DJ v GK. Therefore, only the computer that's playing should be allowed to make or accept a draw offer (unless the arbiter gives permission for a draw due to exceptional circumstances). The consensus is right. This match wasn't GK v DJ; it was GK v 3 humans and 2 copies of DJ. Farcical. -g
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.