Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:06:03 02/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2003 at 05:26:58, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 10, 2003 at 03:20:25, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I gave old Deep Fritz(Deep Fritz6) to analyze the position that the Junior team >>was afraid from and it found no big problem with white's position >> >>The score is negative but I do not see a big drop in the score even after hours >>of analysis on p850. > >This sentence contains the implication that if Fritz had no drop that then they >could be no tactical win in the position. But what GM Alterman said was "and I'm >going for a win". That is exactly the difference between GM and a chess program. >A GM knows how to do it because he sees certain things a computer can't see. Sorry but I am not convinced by the fact that GM's say something. I agree that it is not obvious that the computer is right but it is also not obvious that GM's know more than it. I do not say that black is not winning but that I saw no convincing evidence that black is winning. I know that computers may be wrong in their evaluation but the same is for GM's. Note also that Fritz did not say that black is not better but only that it did not see a significant increase in the evaluation even after hours. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.