Author: Jeroen van Dorp
Date: 04:16:08 02/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2003 at 07:00:06, Ricardo R Santana wrote: >I am a little sceptic about the results of Deep Fritz and Deep Junior against >Kramink and Kasparov. See, Kramnik could play bad endings against DF and win. >Kasparov try to play open games (what about the anti-computer method...). So, >anyway this is not the case. > >But what would happen if we see DF drawing against a 2400 chess player ? I am >sure that if 2400 chess player prepar for a match against a program, I am sure >he can find ways for drawing..so, what we would conclude then ?? You would be a little sceptic too. 1. The result of IM/GM Player X against computer Y is: a. part of a conspiracy b. a result of the greediness of the participants, thus forged c. a setup because the human participant is afraid to lose d. a plain PR-stunt, thus non-valid e. oh yeah, and Deep Blue cheated BTW f. oh yeah, and Kasparov cheated BTW 2. What will give us the definite answer? a. the next man vs. machine macth will give us the definite answer b. when the next man vs. machine match is finished we will return to 1. J.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.