Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 04:38:18 02/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2003 at 19:25:21, mike schoonover wrote:
>he is talking in present text.
>read all of his comments.
>
>{Draw was offered here by Kasparov. He told the arbiter that since the program
>was showing negative score, he can claim a draw. He has no such right in the
>rules, and the arbiter quite properly answered "no comment". In fact Deep Junior
>was showing +0.40, but Boris said white has no advantage and was inclined to
>accept. We initially declined the offer and then a debate started between me and
>Boris, with Shay (who was operating) joining us every few minutes. Boris
>suggested 27. Ba3 Rc4 and we let DJ analyze on the backup machine. It would
>continue 28. a5 and felt quite good about itself.}
>
>this is most telling in present text.three people plus two
>computers colaberating to make a decision.
>read all of amir's post.
>no disjoints.
>it is clearly in present text.
>regards
>mike
Yes, but I'm not surprised. This is the kind of errors that we do who doesn't
have English as our native language.
I said 'obviously' because the rules stated this and cheating regarding this
issue is out of the question. Why should Amir report about that?
/Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.