Author: Maurizio De Leo
Date: 08:30:50 02/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
>dear maurizio, >thanks for your input hear. >it makes it a little clearer. >perhaps one could say it was a kindness to dj too. >regards >mike Yes, maybe it was a kindness also to dj :-) Anyway, sorry if I had been a little too harsh on my first reply. I was under the (wrong) impression that you were trolling by writing a lot of same content messages, while you were actually trying to make a point that seems pretty reasonable. I also started to think that if they were to make another match this rule should be changed, but I remain of my idea that this isn't such a big deal. After all, it can at best save an half point when BOTH the opponent and the computer are wrong, while the team knows better. If Kasparov didn't go for the draw, or if Junior evaluation had been negative, the "rule" effect would have been zero. Maurizio
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.