Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:11:31 02/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2003 at 03:45:44, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On February 11, 2003 at 02:44:48, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>I hope this is correct, because I always trade my queen and pawn for two >>rooks, and a rook and pawn for two minor pieces :) > >Let me engine trade R+P vs B+N was not a good idea, since that often lead to the >variation Bxf2+ Rxf2, Nxf2, Kxf2. I don't know how important it is to tell your >engine this trade is not so good, when you have other very good eval-terms. My >engine is so dumb though that it has to be told that. :) > >Sargon My engine value of pieces tell it that. B+N are evaluated as clearly more than R+P based on Movei's material values so no special code for bad trade is needed here. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.