Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Kasparov. Here's Why.

Author: Graham Laight

Date: 01:51:31 02/11/03

Go up one level in this thread

On February 11, 2003 at 01:02:58, Jouni Uski wrote:

>New York match was billed as The FIDE Man Vs Machine World Chess Championship so
>who won?!
>
>Jouni

My understanding is that in chess, if a championship is drawn, then the title
remains with the holder.

The holder must be beaten for it to go to the challenger.

-g

• Re: Kasparov. Here's Why. Please explain! Machine was champ, not Kaspy! stuart taylor 08:02:22 02/11/03
  • Re: Kasparov. Here's Why. Please explain! Machine was champ, not Kaspy! Bob Durrett 09:40:10 02/11/03
• Actually Pono Jouni Uski 02:13:27 02/11/03
  • Re: Actually Pono Russell Reagan 05:56:52 02/11/03
  • Re: Actually Pono Graham Laight 02:16:46 02/11/03
    • Re: Could be Ponomariov, but he needs to consult his private room : ) Jorge Pichard 02:27:25 02/11/03
      • Re: Could be Ponomariov, but he needs to consult his private room : ) Drexel,Michael 02:45:22 02/11/03
        • Re: Could be Ponomariov, but he needs to consult his private room : ) Rolf Tueschen 03:13:50 02/11/03
          • Re: Could be Ponomariov, but he needs to consult his private room : ) Jorge Pichard 04:44:55 02/11/03
            • Re: Could be Ponomariov, but he needs to consult his private room : ) Bob Durrett 06:45:51 02/11/03
            • Re: Kasparov's blunders prove his decline! Rolf Tueschen 04:53:53 02/11/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.