Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kasparov's blunders prove his decline!

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 04:53:53 02/11/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 11, 2003 at 07:44:55, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>On February 11, 2003 at 06:13:50, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>On February 11, 2003 at 05:45:22, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>
>>>On February 11, 2003 at 05:27:25, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 11, 2003 at 05:16:46, Graham Laight wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On February 11, 2003 at 05:13:27, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On February 11, 2003 at 04:51:31, Graham Laight wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On February 11, 2003 at 01:02:58, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>New York match was billed as The FIDE Man Vs Machine World Chess Championship so
>>>>>>>>who won?!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Jouni
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>My understanding is that in chess, if a championship is drawn, then the title
>>>>>>>remains with the holder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The holder must be beaten for it to go to the challenger.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-g
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But Garry has not been Fide champion in many years - If I remember right
>>>>>>Ponomariov is current.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Next year Kasparov will be Fide World Champion, unless Ponomariov get Deep
>>>>Junior or Deep Fritz with 8 X 1.9 GHz on his private room to consult during the
>>>>match.
>>>
>>>FYI Kasparov has to beat Kramnik or Leko as well.
>>
>>You should know that Jorge is a "Kasparov freak". So we should excuse his
>>blindness for Kasparov's new weaknesses. Kasparov is a patzer and blunders. He
>>is very old and can no longer play his usual game. It's over. :)
>>
>>Rolf Tueschen
>
>I might be blind, but Kasparov performance against human lately has been much
>better than Kramnik or any other player except for Anand who had a great
>performance on his last tournament, but Anand is out of the equation to dispute
>the Title.

Only in respect to Kasparov you are blind. He is now vulerable. He simply
blunders, but only exact calculations could reveil it. GM can do that. So - if
they can forget their irrational respect they can beat Kasparov. It's ridiculous
but they could have known the weakness already from 1997 on! Norm<ally a GM can
see Re8! And also the draw with Qe3. So the truth is, Kasparov's nervousness has
it's root in his own blunders. Not Deep Blue 2.
His blunder Rh5 is either a cheat or the proof for Kasparov's decline.

Rolf Tueschen



>
>Jorge
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Pichard
>>>>
>>>>>OK - I stand corrected. But this does lead to another question: how can they
>>>>>credibly claim that this event was "The FIDE Man Vs Machine World Chess
>>>>>Championship"?
>>>>>
>>>>>-g
>>>>>
>>>>>>Jouni



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.