Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kasparov. Here's Why. Please explain! Machine was champ, not Kaspy!

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 08:02:22 02/11/03

Go up one level in this thread


I mean, I don't know what was official or not, but last major man vs machine
championship waich was seen as such was DB vs Kasparov, in which Machine was
winner.
Maybe Kramnik vs DF was next, but that was also drawn. So what ever way you see
it, the computer should keep the title against the human race, according to your
reasoning!
S.Taylor





On February 11, 2003 at 04:51:31, Graham Laight wrote:

>On February 11, 2003 at 01:02:58, Jouni Uski wrote:
>
>>New York match was billed as The FIDE Man Vs Machine World Chess Championship so
>>who won?!
>>
>>Jouni
>
>My understanding is that in chess, if a championship is drawn, then the title
>remains with the holder.
>
>The holder must be beaten for it to go to the challenger.
>
>-g



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.