Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 09:40:10 02/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2003 at 11:02:22, stuart taylor wrote: >I mean, I don't know what was official or not, but last major man vs machine >championship waich was seen as such was DB vs Kasparov, in which Machine was >winner. >Maybe Kramnik vs DF was next, but that was also drawn. So what ever way you see >it, the computer should keep the title against the human race, according to your >reasoning! >S.Taylor Yes! I agree 100%. Now, would someone please explain that to Kasparov? Bob D. > > > > > >On February 11, 2003 at 04:51:31, Graham Laight wrote: > >>On February 11, 2003 at 01:02:58, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>New York match was billed as The FIDE Man Vs Machine World Chess Championship so >>>who won?! >>> >>>Jouni >> >>My understanding is that in chess, if a championship is drawn, then the title >>remains with the holder. >> >>The holder must be beaten for it to go to the challenger. >> >>-g
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.