Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 07:04:14 02/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2003 at 07:48:18, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 12, 2003 at 07:40:09, Uri Blass wrote: > >>>How can an engine get 96.2 % against it's older version ? >>>Has anybody ever had these strange results ?? > >>I guess big improvement and good choice of the opening to give chances for both >>sides and some luck for beta5 in choosing opening that beta5 knows to play >>relatively better. > >?? > >do you refer on the games against rebel XP or the 2 games against Fritz8 ? > >If it would be luck, you would have to explain why other styles (BETA 1 or >BETA1) >get less score against the same opponent, in the same openings. > > > >>Uri Better is to ask is Beta5 the strongest or didn't you try all settings yet? 2 games against Fritz8 9 or 10 running on a 10 times faster system doesn't even mean a thing Is it usefull and reliable or is it indeed pure luck when it eventualy will win. Was postional everything corectly? I noticed RebelXP and 12 ocasinaly make postional blunders. But so does Fritz. I noticed it looks like the engine becomes dizy before making that blunder. did the program find attacks which other programs don't find That are the sort of questions to ask when you make a personelty not how to beat Fritz Because then I chalange you to play against chessmaster personeletys afterwards. And see how the results are then. If it beats both with great marges you might be on to something. Otherwise you only created an anti Fritz style. But on the SSDF list are lots more of programs then Fritz. Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.